<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; worcester telegram</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilbert.com/blog/tags/worcester-telegram/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilbert.com/blog</link>
	<description>Interesting stuff I find or think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:57:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fixes to I-290/495?</title>
		<link>http://neilbert.com/blog/fixes-to-i-290495/</link>
		<comments>http://neilbert.com/blog/fixes-to-i-290495/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 21:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worcester telegram]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilbert.com/blog/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The The Worcester Telegram &#38; Gazette reports that MassHighway is looking to rework the intersection of I-290 and I-495 in Hudson. I can&#8217;t imagine that it&#8217;s possible to make that interchange any worse; 290 is backed up heading onto 495 south many mornings, and 495 north occasionally. I do like that the image they include&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.telegram.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060623/NEWS/606230792/1116">The  Worcester Telegram &amp; Gazette</a> reports that MassHighway is looking to rework the intersection of I-290 and I-495 in Hudson. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t imagine that it&#8217;s possible to make that interchange any worse; 290 is backed up heading onto 495 south many mornings, and 495 north occasionally. 
</p>
<p>I do like that the image they include is of the way the interchange is now, not what&#8217;s being planned. Not really all that helpful. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neilbert.com/blog/fixes-to-i-290495/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

